If you choose to remember me, please choose to remember a smile on my face and of joy at heart. This is all I ask, be happy, be merry, share of any happiness there may have been, for only part of this life deserves any remembrance.
Friday, March 13, 2015
In The End
In the end, is it not true that we all succumb to the call of Death? Is there then no difference upon us than that of whose terms it is we depart?
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
A Foreboding Thought
Just a thought with a terrible visage
The zest of life, clearly leaking
The zest of life, clearly leaking
Terror by night, terror by day
Acts of men be acts of life
The sudden divergent
With a future failing
An unvisitable past
Worth a fortune
And in the end
The thoughts
Are always
There.
Acts of men be acts of life
The sudden divergent
With a future failing
An unvisitable past
Worth a fortune
And in the end
The thoughts
Are always
There.
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Empyre
Tis a day to stand for the Empyre!
To all of those who decry our overlords, please take a step forward and a step to the left.
To all of those who support our overlords take a step backwards and a step to the right.
Thank you for your cooperation. We shall now commence the fixerations!
BEGIN!
...
Umm sir, you had them move in the wrong directions, the opposers were supposed to go back and right, and the supporters forward and left.
...
Oh, I see then. What shall we do, fixeration was code for kill all who defy us, and it would seem that it would have worked, except IT DID!! For the rebellion!! Attack!!!
...
Sir, poor move. We knew that all those who would have thought that the plan was to kill them would have done the opposite, thus we had the supporters pretend like opposers, so you in essence just revealed yourself as a trader.
...
Oh but you see, I knew you knew
...
We could play this all day, but look here...
Where did you go? NEINNNN!!! I've lost him, our Overlords will be much displeased indeed.
Oh well, time to knit before lunch...
To all of those who decry our overlords, please take a step forward and a step to the left.
To all of those who support our overlords take a step backwards and a step to the right.
Thank you for your cooperation. We shall now commence the fixerations!
BEGIN!
...
Umm sir, you had them move in the wrong directions, the opposers were supposed to go back and right, and the supporters forward and left.
...
Oh, I see then. What shall we do, fixeration was code for kill all who defy us, and it would seem that it would have worked, except IT DID!! For the rebellion!! Attack!!!
...
Sir, poor move. We knew that all those who would have thought that the plan was to kill them would have done the opposite, thus we had the supporters pretend like opposers, so you in essence just revealed yourself as a trader.
...
Oh but you see, I knew you knew
...
We could play this all day, but look here...
Where did you go? NEINNNN!!! I've lost him, our Overlords will be much displeased indeed.
Oh well, time to knit before lunch...
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Sensation
So today we are all gathering together in separate parts of the globe to announce the spectacle of spectacles; the eye. We are all really quite excited for this event and have been looking forward to it for quite some time, as a matter of fact we have been waiting for it all our lives as well as the lives of our ancestors. So without further ado, we present to you the eye! WOW, just look at all the stuff, there's big stuff, and little stuff, and just look at you honey... wow... I mean look at you, this isn't at all what I pictured you looked like... umm, I think we have a problem here... I don't think things are gonna work out... WAIT! I have an idea! Hand me those nails! ***AHHHH OWWWW JESUS! SOMEBODY HELP!
*A few hours later*
So now I'm picturing you as I saw you... sorry...
Do you think I would stay with someone so stupid as to scratch their newly found eyes out? I just wanted to make sure you were alright
"Eye scream, you scream, we all scream for eye screams"
Shawn Davis
*A few hours later*
So now I'm picturing you as I saw you... sorry...
Do you think I would stay with someone so stupid as to scratch their newly found eyes out? I just wanted to make sure you were alright
"Eye scream, you scream, we all scream for eye screams"
Shawn Davis
Tuesday, September 13, 2011
Fluxation
Think about it. What if the universe were a thinking entity and we were all the neurons of its massive cerebral engine? Are we finite? Will there be a reckoning? Will there be enough cheese at the party? Should I bring my own drinks? Where am I going with this? Who are you? How did you get here? See, that's what you did wrong, you were supposed to take a left at the stop sign to get to Canada.
"Canadia"
Shawn Davis
"Canadia"
Shawn Davis
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
My complaint about Kathy Nicklaus
I have been meaning to write this letter for some time now and, in light of recent developments, I believe it is appropriate. First, the misinformation: Kathy Nicklaus suggests that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. Where the heck did she come up with that? In other words, to what degree is she going to perpetuate misguided and questionable notions of other paltry blatherskites' intentions? If you contend that the Universe belongs to Kathy by right then you won't understand my answer no matter how carefully I explain it. You won't understand my answer if you assert that "the truth", "the whole truth", and "nothing but the truth" are three different things. However, you have a chance at understanding my answer if you're open-minded enough to realize that I used to believe that Kathy was an egocentric, mendacious publicity hound. However, after seeing how she wants to impale us on the pike of cameralism, I now have an even lower opinion of her. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that Kathy says that she is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. Although Kathy obviously cut that statement out of whole cloth, I'm sure she seriously believes that her blessing is the equivalent of a papal imprimatur, seeing how her selective memory works. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: her foolish arguments.
Kathy's older nostrums were pertinacious enough. Her latest ones are doubtlessly beyond the pale. One immanent characteristic of Kathy's communications is that they prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror. Now I could go off on that point alone, but in a recent tell-all, a former member of her crime syndicate writes that "the worst classes of stubborn treasonous-types there are have an insatiable appetite for Kathy's dulcet but grotty piffle". Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that Kathy says that she is a refined lady with the soundest education and morals you can imagine and that therefore it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to supplant national heroes with repulsive, arrogant spoiled brats. Hello? Is Mr. Logic down at the pub with a dozen pints inside him or what? Kathy's secret passion is to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. For shame!
To parody the old song, "Fish gotta swim, Kathy gotta usher in the beginning of an obstinate new era of fetishism." She expects us to behave like passive sheep. The only choice Kathy believes we should be allowed to make for ourselves is whether to head towards her slaughterhouse at a trot or at a gallop. She sincerely doesn't want us choosing to discuss the relationship between three converging and ever-growing factions—disloyal, obtuse peddlers of snake-oil remedies, petulant swaggerers, and barbaric braggarts. Curiously, if I thought that her zingers had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that Kathy has tried keeping essential documents hidden from the public until they become politically moot. She has also tried etiolating her critics. Why does Kathy do such things? As you ponder the answer to that question, consider that when people see laughable warlords behaving like laughable warlords they begin to realize that Kathy once tried to convince a bunch of us that our only chance of saving the planet is to accept unending regulations and straightjacket "reforms" from her proxies. Fortunately, calmer heads prevailed and a number of people informed the rest of the gang that I have a plan to yank up misinformed vandals of various stripes from the dark rocks under which they hide and flaunt them before the bright sunshine of public exposure. I call this plan "Operation drive off and disperse the belligerent smut peddlers who leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that in Kathy's plaints, plagiarism is witting and unremitting, unholy and gloomy. She revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to engulf reason and humanity within waves of neopaganism and fear.
The fact that Kathy is a mean old Scrooge is distressing, to say the least. Her casus belli will have consequences—very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to serve on the side of Truth. We ought to spread the word that whenever anyone states the obvious—that she refuses to do anything for herself—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "What meaningless self-inflicted psychological trauma is she going through now?" If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that every time she utters or writes a statement that supports autism—even indirectly—it sends a message that she can override nature. I unequivocally insist that we mustn't let her make such statements, partly because we are indeed living in purblind times, but primarily because what I call foolhardy nebbishes have increasingly been placing our children at imminent risk of serious harm. Kathy has a lot to answer for in regard to that.
If you can go more than a minute without hearing Kathy talk about classism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. Even giving her the benefit of the doubt, if she can one day get everyone to march in lockstep with her jaded shock troops then the long descent into night is sure to follow. Some of you may feel a little sheepish about investigating Kathy's pudibund principles, ideals, and objectives. Don't. We must all work together towards that end if we're ever to open minds instead of closing them.
I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "Kathy's pretentious, imprudent metanarratives are chockablock with anarchism." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that Kathy is just trying to pick a fight. That's why she says that no one is smart enough to see through her transparent lies. Is there a chance that Kathy isn't boisterous, ill-natured, and stiff-necked? From what I've seen, I doubt it. She refuses to come to terms with reality. Kathy prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.
Please, please, please help me bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. Without your help, Kathy will decidedly promulgate partisan prejudice against others. She has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough. It's easy to see that I hate how she shows such callous indifference to those whose lives she's ruined, but let me tell you the rest of the story: Kathy likes to arouse the hostility and excite the cupidity of coprophagous purveyors of malice and hatred. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Kathy and her myrmidons will run for cover like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Kathy's ruses have become. She is trying to brainwash us. She wants us to believe that it's loathsome to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that if Kathy thinks that she can make me dig my own grave and pay for the shovel then she's barking up the wrong tree.
Kathy's comments are often appallingly unforgiving, sometimes oligophrenic, frequently off-point, and occasionally sexist. Nevertheless, they do tell us something important about Kathy. They tell us that Kathy intends to obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be completely obvious to all. Speaking of which, she operates on an international scale to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to challenge Kathy's disruptive assumptions about merit.
In spite of the fact that Kathy has flirted with favoritism and some of the more exotic forms of colonialism, many people respond to her noxious, unscrupulous vituperations in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. Even her adulators couldn't deal with the full impact of her ebullitions. That's why they created "Kathy-ism," which is just a wrongheaded excuse to cause obstreperous subversion to gather momentum on college campuses. There's no mystery about it, no more room for fairy tales, just the knowledge that she is greatly increasing the size of her dangerous faction by needling and wheedling loquacious know-nothings into it. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that if you don't think that the mess that Kathy has left behind is sometimes hard to see but eventually will be impossible to ignore, then you've missed the whole point of this letter.
I had thought the world was free of short-sighted boneheads. So imagine my surprise when I discovered that Kathy wants to blacklist her adversaries as terrorist sympathizers or traitors. Her ideologies are so nebulous and malleable that they can be used to justify any scabrous quips. That conclusion is not based on some sort of lackadaisical philosophy or on Kathy-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that if we do nothing, Kathy will keep on destroying that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can establish beyond a shred of doubt that it is morally unjustifiable for Kathy to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. We must put an end to diabolic simplism. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to clear the cobwebs out of people's heads and help them understand that Kathy exhibits signs of arrested development. You must be the one to communicate and teach. And you must inform your fellow man that if I have a bias, it is only against domineering exhibitionists who incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. Everything I've written in this letter amounts to this: Kathy Nicklaus's refrains are fatally fissiparous.
"Gosh"
Shawn Davis
Kathy's older nostrums were pertinacious enough. Her latest ones are doubtlessly beyond the pale. One immanent characteristic of Kathy's communications is that they prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror. Now I could go off on that point alone, but in a recent tell-all, a former member of her crime syndicate writes that "the worst classes of stubborn treasonous-types there are have an insatiable appetite for Kathy's dulcet but grotty piffle". Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that Kathy says that she is a refined lady with the soundest education and morals you can imagine and that therefore it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to supplant national heroes with repulsive, arrogant spoiled brats. Hello? Is Mr. Logic down at the pub with a dozen pints inside him or what? Kathy's secret passion is to lay all of society open to the predations of organized criminality. For shame!
To parody the old song, "Fish gotta swim, Kathy gotta usher in the beginning of an obstinate new era of fetishism." She expects us to behave like passive sheep. The only choice Kathy believes we should be allowed to make for ourselves is whether to head towards her slaughterhouse at a trot or at a gallop. She sincerely doesn't want us choosing to discuss the relationship between three converging and ever-growing factions—disloyal, obtuse peddlers of snake-oil remedies, petulant swaggerers, and barbaric braggarts. Curiously, if I thought that her zingers had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that Kathy has tried keeping essential documents hidden from the public until they become politically moot. She has also tried etiolating her critics. Why does Kathy do such things? As you ponder the answer to that question, consider that when people see laughable warlords behaving like laughable warlords they begin to realize that Kathy once tried to convince a bunch of us that our only chance of saving the planet is to accept unending regulations and straightjacket "reforms" from her proxies. Fortunately, calmer heads prevailed and a number of people informed the rest of the gang that I have a plan to yank up misinformed vandals of various stripes from the dark rocks under which they hide and flaunt them before the bright sunshine of public exposure. I call this plan "Operation drive off and disperse the belligerent smut peddlers who leave behind a legacy of perpetual indebtedness in developing countries". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that in Kathy's plaints, plagiarism is witting and unremitting, unholy and gloomy. She revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to engulf reason and humanity within waves of neopaganism and fear.
The fact that Kathy is a mean old Scrooge is distressing, to say the least. Her casus belli will have consequences—very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to serve on the side of Truth. We ought to spread the word that whenever anyone states the obvious—that she refuses to do anything for herself—discussion naturally progresses towards the question, "What meaningless self-inflicted psychological trauma is she going through now?" If I'm not mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that every time she utters or writes a statement that supports autism—even indirectly—it sends a message that she can override nature. I unequivocally insist that we mustn't let her make such statements, partly because we are indeed living in purblind times, but primarily because what I call foolhardy nebbishes have increasingly been placing our children at imminent risk of serious harm. Kathy has a lot to answer for in regard to that.
If you can go more than a minute without hearing Kathy talk about classism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. Even giving her the benefit of the doubt, if she can one day get everyone to march in lockstep with her jaded shock troops then the long descent into night is sure to follow. Some of you may feel a little sheepish about investigating Kathy's pudibund principles, ideals, and objectives. Don't. We must all work together towards that end if we're ever to open minds instead of closing them.
I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, "Kathy's pretentious, imprudent metanarratives are chockablock with anarchism." That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that Kathy is just trying to pick a fight. That's why she says that no one is smart enough to see through her transparent lies. Is there a chance that Kathy isn't boisterous, ill-natured, and stiff-necked? From what I've seen, I doubt it. She refuses to come to terms with reality. Kathy prefers instead to live in a fantasy world of rationalization and hallucination.
Please, please, please help me bear witness to the plain, unvarnished truth. Without your help, Kathy will decidedly promulgate partisan prejudice against others. She has got to go—and yesterday isn't soon enough. It's easy to see that I hate how she shows such callous indifference to those whose lives she's ruined, but let me tell you the rest of the story: Kathy likes to arouse the hostility and excite the cupidity of coprophagous purveyors of malice and hatred. Such activity can flourish only in the dark, however. If you drag it into the open, Kathy and her myrmidons will run for cover like cockroaches in a dirty kitchen when the light is turned on suddenly during the night. That's why we must fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Kathy's ruses have become. She is trying to brainwash us. She wants us to believe that it's loathsome to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that if Kathy thinks that she can make me dig my own grave and pay for the shovel then she's barking up the wrong tree.
Kathy's comments are often appallingly unforgiving, sometimes oligophrenic, frequently off-point, and occasionally sexist. Nevertheless, they do tell us something important about Kathy. They tell us that Kathy intends to obfuscate the issue so that one can't see what ought to be completely obvious to all. Speaking of which, she operates on an international scale to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale, but to challenge Kathy's disruptive assumptions about merit.
In spite of the fact that Kathy has flirted with favoritism and some of the more exotic forms of colonialism, many people respond to her noxious, unscrupulous vituperations in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. Even her adulators couldn't deal with the full impact of her ebullitions. That's why they created "Kathy-ism," which is just a wrongheaded excuse to cause obstreperous subversion to gather momentum on college campuses. There's no mystery about it, no more room for fairy tales, just the knowledge that she is greatly increasing the size of her dangerous faction by needling and wheedling loquacious know-nothings into it. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that if you don't think that the mess that Kathy has left behind is sometimes hard to see but eventually will be impossible to ignore, then you've missed the whole point of this letter.
I had thought the world was free of short-sighted boneheads. So imagine my surprise when I discovered that Kathy wants to blacklist her adversaries as terrorist sympathizers or traitors. Her ideologies are so nebulous and malleable that they can be used to justify any scabrous quips. That conclusion is not based on some sort of lackadaisical philosophy or on Kathy-style mental masturbation, but on widely known and proven principles of science. These principles explain that if we do nothing, Kathy will keep on destroying that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. One cannot change this all in a moment, but one can establish beyond a shred of doubt that it is morally unjustifiable for Kathy to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. We must put an end to diabolic simplism. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to clear the cobwebs out of people's heads and help them understand that Kathy exhibits signs of arrested development. You must be the one to communicate and teach. And you must inform your fellow man that if I have a bias, it is only against domineering exhibitionists who incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. Everything I've written in this letter amounts to this: Kathy Nicklaus's refrains are fatally fissiparous.
"Gosh"
Shawn Davis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
